August 31, 2009
October 1994 - The Jim Cowles Collection

From Jim E. Cowles of Dallas (Cowles & Thompson), this from a plaintiff's deposition - one of the "3,032 plaintiffs ... in the infamous Lone Star Steel cases, pending in Morris County since 1987" - taken by Jim Harris of Beaumont (Holmes & Harris).

Q. What did your sister die of?

A. You would have to ask her - I would be speculating if I told you.

Jim adds suggested follow-up questions: from our Astute Attorneys include (1) Do you have her telephone number and is it long-distance? (2) So, then, would it be your suggestion that we contact Shirley MacLaine? (3) Would you mind if I sent this to Buchmeyer's column?

And about Jim Cowles, from Gregory J. McCarthy of Dallas, this excerpt from a deposition taken by him and Stan Thiebaud (Cowles & Thompson).

Q. Did Mr. Thiebaud tell you which firm he was with?

A. Yes.

Q. What's the name of his firm?

A. What is it? Thompson - I'm sorry.

Mr. Thiebaud: That's part of it.

A. Thompson & - God.

Q. You don't remember right now?

A. No, I don't.

Gregory adds: "It's good to know that Jim Cowles had finally gotten the recognition he so richly deserves.

August 28, 2009
September 1998 - Did They Really Say That?

From a federal court criminal trial in Dallas:

Mr. Hunter: Your Honor, I understand that our witness had gone to the parking lot to retrieve his glasses. So I understand we're going to be penalized for it, but that's what we're waiting for. And I apologize to the court. I'll take a voluntary five minutes if people are wanting to go to the bathroom on me.

The Court: On you?

Mr. Held: I don't think I'll touch that.

August 27, 2009
September 1997 - Great Moments in the History of Justice

From District Judge Manuel Banales of the 105th Judicial District (Nueces, Kleberg & Kenedy Counties), this Somewhat Great Moment in which "History - of sorts - was made in [his] courtroom [in] Kleberg County on March 11, 1997."

Q. And that's your only conversation with Mr. Montoya or Ms. Manqueros?

The Bailiff: Judge?

Mr. Kearney: Your Honor?

Unidentified Juror: There's a huge roach and it's distracting.

The Court: Oh, Really.

Unidentified Juror: It's about to jump on him.

Agent Gilson: Oh, I see it.

Unidentified Juror: I don't know where it went now.

Agent Gilson: It's back here.

The Court Reporter: It's right there.

The Court: Do you want to smack it, Rick [the Bailiff]?

Unidentified Juror: I'm sorry, but all I could do was see that thing crawling around.

[Missing from the record at this point is "a pretty loud stomp," according to Judge Banales.]

The Court: Is it history?

Agent Gilson: It's history.

Unidentified Juror: Thank you.

The Court: All right. The question again.

August 26, 2009
October 1995 ...

Here are a few examples - questions and answers that actually happened in depositions or trials - from my past et cetera columns.

But Did You Recover?

Q. What did the doctor tell you about your condition?
A. That I had worked up a bad case of lazy.

And the Lawyers

Q. Now, Mrs. Johnson, how was your first marriage terminated?
A. By death.
Q. And by whose death was it terminated?
Death and Experts

Q. Now, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, in most cases, he just passes quietly away and doesn't know anything about it until the next morning?


Q. Mr. Slattery, you went on a rather elaborate honeymoon, didn't you?
A. I went to Europe, sir.
Q. You took your new wife?

And the Child Witness

Q. And lastly, Gary, all of your responses must be oral, okay? What school do you go to?
A. Oral.
Q. And where do you live?
A. Oral.

August 25, 2009
June 1994 - Doing Voir Dire

From Jon L. Anderson of Lufkin, this excerpt from the voir dire in a capital murder case in Angelina County before Judge David Wilson (217th District Court). Jon was the defense attorney, and the prosecutor was Angelina County District Attorney Clyde Herrington.

Mr. Herrington: Where they used the word "intentional," if you say, "yes, it's intentional," then it's not automatic that it's deliberate. You have to look and say, okay; they intended to do it, but did they make a conscious decision? Yes, they did. Yes, it's deliberate. Or, if you think, well, they intended to do it, but they did it without really making a conscious decision. It's like if I knock that cup over, I intended to do that. I intended for that cup to go over. But I really probably didn't think about it, because if I had of, I would have realized that there was water in the cup? Okay?

Judge Wilson: Excuse me just a second. Would you go get a paper towel to mop up the water on the table?

Mr. Herrington: I've got a handkerchief, Judge.

August 24, 2009
December 1997 - I Did a Buchmeyer

From Jeffrey Hirt of Houston, this excerpt from his examination of the present wife of his client:

Q. Gina, how long have you known your stepdaughters?

A. Actually, since before they were born. When Joan was still pregnant.

Mr. Hirt: I'll send that one to Jerry Buchmeyer.

August 21, 2009
December 1996 - Objectionable Objections

From Joseph A. Fischer, III of Houston (Mayor, Day, etc.), this rather imaginative - but certainly useful - objection made by the opposing attorney during the plaintiff's deposition.

Q. (By Mr. Fischer): So your testimony is that your failure to remember what was provided to you makes what was provided to you inadequate?

Plaintiff's Attorney: Objection to the form of the question. That's a tricky question.

Q. (By Mr. Fischer): You can answer it if you understand it.

Plaintiff's Attorney: The objection to the question is being too tricky.

August 20, 2009
May 1998 - Telling It Like It Is

From Thomas A. Chambers of Liberty, this excerpt from the cross-examination of the defendant in a criminal assault case.

Q. You were mad when you went to [the victim's] door, weren't you?

A. No, but I was real pissed off.

August 19, 2009
May 1998 - Classic Typos

From Patrick Shaw of Dallas (Woodward Shaw & Howell), from a letter by a Dallas mediator:

... the March 20, 1998 date of 1:30 p.m. is confirmed unless all three of you agree to medicate at 8:30 a.m.

From Susan K. Pavlica of Houston (Mayer, Brown & Platt), from a transmittal letter to the district clerk:

Pursuant to the Court's instructions, I am an Amended Notice of Oral Hearing ...

From Thomas M. Fulkerson of Houston (Clements, O'Neill, Pierce & Nickens), from a pleading in an Exxon case: This suit involves real property interest and title to land in Zapata County, Texas, [and] breeches of contract covenants.

August 18, 2009
September 1997 - Did They Really Say That?

From Philip R. Russ of Amarillo, this contribution of a father being cross-examined during the trial of an oil and gas lease case:

Q. Well, I mean why should we believe anything that's coming out of your mouth as you sit here right now?

A. Well, I don't suppose you have to believe any of it. All I'm trying to do is convince the jury.

August 17, 2009
September 1995 - Did They Really Say That?

From John Adams of Austin (John is the clerk of the Texas Supreme Court), this excerpt from a letter by an attorney requesting to be "placed on inactive status" because of a medical breakthrough.

Dear Sir:

I have been an active member of the Texas Bar Association since _____. In _____, I moved to Virginia with my husband who is an officer in the U.S. Air Force and recently had twin boys. As I do not anticipate actively practicing law in Texas any time in the near future, I request that my membership in the Texas Bar Association be placed on inactive status.

August 14, 2009
December 1998 - I Love an Honest Man

From Stuart Smith of Waco (Naman, Howell, Smith & Lee), this excerpt from the deposition of an eye witness to an accident.

Q. Did y'all ever go out and do anything together?

A. Yeah, a time or two.

Q. Did he seem to be having trouble with his hand?

A. Yeah. His hand hurt tremendously when we were up there.

Q. When y'all went out a time or two, what were y'all doing?

A. Well, I was making a slobbering idiot out of myself drinking, but I don't recall what Junior was doing.

Q. Fair enough.

Mr. English: I love an honest man.

August 13, 2009
April 2001 - Classic Typo's

From Alan M. McGraw of Round Rock, this typo from "a real estate contract recently proposed by a California lawyer."

... the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover any amounts that the courts may judge to be reasonable attorneys' feed from the opposing party.

Alan responded to the proposed contract: "Whilst it is true that the legal profession is oft compared to sharks and other meat eating scoundrels, I doubt many attorneys will be willing to work for feed.

August 12, 2009
July 2000 - What Was That Date Again?

From Amy Hanner of Austin (Amy is a legal assistant to Velva L. Price of the firm of Kothmann & Associates), this excerpt from a deposition taken by Velva Price - who is the president-elect of the Travis County Bar Association.

Q. When was the last time you hunted?

A. The last day I was in Brady.

Q. Okay. And that would be - I'm sorry. When was the last day you were in Brady?

A. That would have been after the 30th, probably the 32nd or so, whenever the last day of hunting season was.

Mr. Phenix: 32nd? Are you going to create a new month?

A. After the 31st. Yeah, right, after the 32nd.

Q. (By Ms. Price) I like [Mr. Phenix] going after somebody other than me, so thank you.

August 11, 2009
July 1999 - The Doctor's Certificate

From Judge Tom Bacus of Wichita Falls (County Court at Law No. 2), this excerpt from a doctor's certificate in a civil commitment case - in which the "doctor graphically documented the results of his personal interview with the patient."

"1. On or about _____, the above named person said the following:


Judge Bacus adds: "Needless to say, the subsequent hearing was fairly short."

August 10, 2009
July 1998 - Those Jurors

From G. David Ringer of Dallas (McKinley, Ringer & Zeiger), this response to a jury questionnaire from a trial David had in Rockwall County:

How long have you lived in this county? All my life.

Where did you previously live? Chicago.

August 07, 2009
September 1995 - The Wonderful World of Pro Se

From Preston W. McGee of Tyler (Potter, Minton, etc.), these two marvelous pro se motions that were astutely denied by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie.

Come Now Henry W. _____, plaintiff in the above-entitled and numbered cause, to file this motion to personally conduct a deposition on each and every member for the grand jury to see if their blood is not tainted.

Come Now Henry W. _____, plaintiff in the above-entitled and numbered cause, to file this second motion to allow media coverage in the courtroom during the trial, of the following stations: 20/20, Hard Copy, Case Closed, Inside Edition, Dateline News, and 60 Minutes.

August 06, 2009
July 1997 - Couldn't Resist

In a motion filed in one of my cases, the defendant's attorney presented this classic typo: "Large portions of the Plaintiff's Affidavits are inadmissable heresy." After I stopped laughing, the only thing I could do was enter this Order:

The Defendant's Motion To Strike Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Affidavits is GRANTED but only to the Following Extent: the request on page 2 to strike those portions of the affidavits as "inadmissable heresy" is GRANTED, and these heretical portions of the affidavits SHALL first have a wooden stake driven through them and next shall be boiled in oil!!


August 05, 2009
February 1999 - Did They Really Ask That?

From Donald J. Hahn of Dallas (Collins, Norman & Basinger), this question that a lawyer asked his client in a hearing in Probate Court No. 2 (Judge Robert E. Price):

Q. Now, Mrs. Smith, is it true that you were well acquainted with John Smith as a result of the fact that you were married to him for over 55 years?

August 04, 2009
April 2005 - A Marvelous Answer

This contribution from David W. Lindemood of Midland is from a CPS trial before District Judge Dean Rucker (318th District Court) in which Lindemood was the attorney ad litem for the child. The witness, who was the CASA guardian ad litem, is being questioned by Chris McCormack of Midland.

Q. As I understand your testimony about Ms. Ybarra's residence, living situation, you only went into one of the homes that she lived in? Do I have that right?

A. Two.

Q. Two. And on each occasion that you went in there, the residence was clean and orderly, generally - or actually, one was clean and orderly, and one was a little messy, a bachelor pad, as I recall now.

A. That's right.

Q. But no - other than being a little messy, it was not filthy or dirty? Umkempt?

A. It was being swept up and picked up with a shovel.

August 03, 2009
October 1996 - The Judicial Corner

From District Judge Willie B. DuBose of Midland (385th District Court), this excerpt from a cocaine possession case he tried earlier this year. Judge DuBose sets the scene: Tom Parker, assisted by Bob Stevens, was representing the defendant and Wayne Frost was prosecuting. The witness, a police officer, presented three sealed envelopes, one of which contained the cocaine. He opened the first two, but there was no cocaine, so he opened the third - but pulled out a syringe that had never been mentioned in connection with the defendant. The jury was removed from the court, and then...

Mr. Frost: The evidence we have been looking for.

The Witness: Right here.

Mr. Parker: Well, you have already opened that one over there and said that was the one.

Mr. Frost: It wasn't the one.

Mr. Parker: It wasn't the one?

The Witness: It wasn't.

Mr. Frost: Put this back in there.

Mr. Parker: Stevens, think of something here. We have exhibited something to the jury [the syringe] that didn't come from him. It seems like I ought to make an objection. I'm just not sure what it is.

Judge DuBose: You figure it out, and I'll figure out how to rule on it.

Subscribe to this feed


About the Judge

In Memory of Judge Jerry Buchmeyer, 1933-2009
Real life Texas Courtroom Humor.
From 1980 to 2008, U.S. District Judge Jerry Buchmeyer entertained lawyers far and wide with his "et cetera" column in the Texas Bar Journal. For this page, we've reached into the vault to bring you classic material spanning two decades of courtroom humor, most of which comes straight from actual depostions and trials.

Say What?! Archives
02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003
03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003
04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003
05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003
06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003
07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003
08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003
09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008
02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008
03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008
04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008
05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008
09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009
02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009
03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009
04/01/2009 - 05/01/2009
05/01/2009 - 06/01/2009
06/01/2009 - 07/01/2009
07/01/2009 - 08/01/2009
08/01/2009 - 09/01/2009
09/01/2009 - 10/01/2009
10/01/2009 - 11/01/2009
11/01/2009 - 12/01/2009
12/01/2009 - 01/01/2010
01/01/2010 - 02/01/2010


Buchmeyer's First Podcast

In June 2006, Judge Buchmeyer was interviewed by the Legal Talk Network.

Click here to listen (Windows Media format)

Classic Articles

Labor Relations: The Wututtut Review Brimelow v. Casson (& A Strike)
June 1983

Jurisdiction: Serving Satan Mayo v. Satan & His Staff
February 1984

Judicial Reasoning: "The Law Is A Ass"
December 1983

'Tis the Season
December 1984

A Fable
March 1985

Classic Article Archive


Order Buchmeyer's new book, Texas Courtroom Humor (pdf format)

Ernie The Attorney Searching for Truth & Justice (in an unjust world)

Inter alia An internet legal research weblog

Lawhaha Andrew McClurg's Legal Humor Headquarters

MyBarPageCalendarContact UsSite Map

Powered by Blogger