SECTIONS
Global Thinking
Ethical issues that may come into play when Texas lawyers deal with clients that have international interests.
By Thomas H. Wilson, John Vernon, and James W. Skelton Jr.
The concept of “international human rights” is based on the
International Bill of Human Rights, which is derived from the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights—adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in
1948—and two international treaties, the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social,
and Cultural Rights. Although these are public international law
documents, you do not need to be an “international human rights lawyer”
to encounter related issues.
For Texas lawyers, matters related to international human rights can
arise in what may appear to be a simple assignment from a client. For
instance, you receive an email from a longtime client saying he or she
is thrilled to have a new project in a small country in Asia but that
there are many dangers in the region for his or her workers ranging from
armed conflict to tigers. Therefore, your client intends to hire a
security company as the project develops and has attached a draft
contract for its selected security company for your review.
As a preliminary matter, you conduct some research about the security
company in hopes of finding other agreements online it has entered into.
Instead, you find a number of reports from nongovernmental human rights
organizations alleging that this security company has mistreated workers
in various Asian countries. The allegations include confiscating
passports from migrant workers and otherwise blocking their ability to
leave the workforce and return home. Additionally, you see reports
linking the company to the forced removal of indigenous people from
their homelands. News stories even indicate that it has been accused of
incidents of violence against both indigenous people and migrant
workers.
The current ethical rules applicable to Texas-licensed lawyers speak
extensively about your duty to represent your clients. In the scenario
described above, what is your ethical obligation to advise your client
about the issues related to his or her chosen security company? Is there
even an ethical obligation to conduct a due diligence background search
if you anticipate potential human rights problems in the country where
your client operates? If you suspect such human rights issues, do you
then have an obligation to revise the agreement with an eye toward
controlling these types of abuses? The preamble to Texas Disciplinary
Rules of Professional Conduct states that “lawyers, as guardians of the
law, play a vital role in the preservation of society.” Rule 1.02 makes
it clear that Texas lawyers may not assist or counsel a client to engage
in conduct that is known by the lawyer to be criminal or fraudulent. The
rules also state that when the lawyer knows that the client expects
representation not permitted by the conduct regulations, he or she
should consult with the client regarding the relevant limitations on the
lawyer’s conduct. Comments 7 and 8 to Rule 1.02 make it clear that Texas
lawyers are required to give an honest opinion to the client about the
actual consequences that appear likely to result from the conduct and
make reasonable efforts to dissuade the client from committing a crime
or fraud.
While we may try to apply the Texas Disciplinary Rules to the scenario
described earlier, it is difficult to discern exactly what the ethical
duties are when a client is not directly involved in any crime or fraud.
Some types of activities considered violations of international human
rights are not crimes in some jurisdictions. For instance, while slavery
or human trafficking is a crime under international law and in most
countries, other actions—such as excessive limitations on migrant
workers’ ability to leave a worksite because of confiscation of
passports, child labor, and forced relocation of indigenous people—may
not violate local law even when such actions do violate the so-called
“soft law” described by the United Nations Guiding Principles on
Business and Human Rights issued in 2011 or the hard law of other
countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom. These issues
are even more complicated because, as in the scenario described
previously, it is often the client’s subcontractors or even
subcontractors of subcontractors who may be involved in human rights
violations. Under the current rules, you may question whether your
ethical obligation is solely to reduce the liability and exposure of
your client or to go further in attempting to eliminate the possibility
of human rights abuses by trying to persuade your client to avoid
entering into a potentially harmful contractual relationship.
Recognizing the disciplinary rules of many jurisdictions do not
clearly address a lawyer’s ethical obligations in regards to
international human rights concerns, the International Bar Association
issued its Business and Human Rights Guidance for Bar Associations in
October 2014. Then, following 18 months of research, the IBA published
in June 2016 its Practical Guide on Business and Human Rights for
Business Lawyers, which uses scenarios similar to the one highlighted in
this article to illustrate the circumstances in which international
human rights issues may arise and the issues a lawyer could face.
The International Law Section of the State Bar of Texas established
the International Human Rights Committee in August 2015 to study and
inform members about these issues. The committee intends to provide
guidance to Texas lawyers on the U.N. Guiding Principles in relation to
the Texas Disciplinary Rules. In the past year, the committee has made
presentations to a number of local bar associations and organizations,
published articles, and debated within the committee about the ethical
questions posed earlier in this article.
The committee’s website, ilstexas.org/human-rights-committee,
includes educational information on these issues, the section’s recent
guide, and a list of committee members with contact information. Please
feel free to reach out if you seek more information on the topic or wish
for members of the committee to make a presentation to any organization,
your law firm, or company.TBJ
THOMAS H. WILSON is chair and JOHN VERNON and JAMES W. SKELTON JR. are members of the Human Rights Committee of the International Law Section of the State Bar of Texas. |