|
General questions regarding attorney discipline should
be directed to the Chief Disciplinary Counsel's Office, toll-free (877)
953-5535 or (512) 453-5535. The Board of Disciplinary Appeals may be reached
at (800) 204-2222 or (512) 463-1463, Ext. 2137. The State Commission on
Judicial Conduct may be contacted toll-free, (877) 228-5750 or (512) 463-5533.
Please note that persons disciplined by the Commission on Judicial Conduct
are not necessarily licensed attorneys.
RESIGNATION
On May 14, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation,
in lieu of discipline, of George M. Hamm [#08853500], 55, of Houston.
Hamm was charged with violating Rules 1.01(b)(1) and (b)(2), 1.03(a) and
(b), and 1.15(d).
DISBARMENTS
On Jan. 25, an evidentiary panel of the District 10-B
Grievance Committee entered a default judgment of disbarment against Alex
H. Coy III [#04965800], 45, of Converse. The panel found that on June
7, 2000, Coy was served with an evidentiary panel charge and proposed hearing
order from the State Bar. He failed to timely file a responsive pleading.
He was served with notice of default on Aug. 16, 2000. On Dec. 26, 2000,
Coy was served with a motion for default judgment and order setting hearing.
He failed to appear at the hearing. At the hearing, the panel found that
in five separate cases, Coy violated Rules 1.01(b)(1) and (b)(2), 1.03(a)
and (b), 1.06(a) and (b)(2), 1.08(a), 1.15(a)(2) and (d), and 8.04(a)(8).
He was ordered to pay $500 to one complainant, $500 to a second complainant,
and $600 to a third complainant. The panel found that Coy's misconduct damaged
a fourth complainant in the amount of $100,000. Coy was also ordered to
pay $3,300 in attorney's fees and $532.50 in costs.
On March 8, Jerome L. Croston, Jr. [#05139000], 56,
of Dallas received a default judgment of disbarment. An evidentiary panel
of the District 6-A Grievance Committee found that in one case, Croston
neglected a client's bankruptcy matter, allowing delinquent property taxes
to be charged to his client. In a second case, Croston failed to do any
meaningful work on a client's case, allowing the case to be dismissed. He
failed to communicate with his client or inform his client of the status
or outcome of the case. In a third case, Croston failed to file a lawsuit
on behalf of his client, allowing the statute of limitations to expire.
In a fourth case, Croston failed to comply with the terms of a judgment
issued by a grievance committee or respond to a request for information
from the committee. Croston violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.14(b),
1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(1), (a)(7), and (a)(8). He was ordered to pay $1,269
in attorney's fees, $300 in court costs, and $1,000 in restitution.
On April 5, Dennis E. Guffey [#08592450], 51, of
Grand Prairie received a default judgment of disbarment. An evidentiary
panel of the District 6-A Grievance Committee found that in one case, Guffey
neglected his client's bankruptcy matter by not filing documents in a timely
manner. He also failed to complete the matter, respond to the client's requests
for information regarding the matter, or respond to notice of the complaint
from the grievance committee. In another case, Guffey did not respond to
notice of a complaint from the grievance committee. Guffey violated Rules
1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $1,531 in attorney's
fees, $450 in costs, and $440 in restitution.
SUSPENSIONS
On May 8, Joseph W. Breshears [#02959200], 44,
of Fort Worth agreed to a three-year, fully-probated suspension effective
May 1. The District 7-A Grievance Committee found that in one case, Breshears
was retained in a personal injury matter. He neglected the matter and failed
to return his client's calls. Breshears also failed to keep his client reasonably
informed of the status of the matter and relocated his office without notifying
the client. Breshears failed to return the client's file upon request after
termination of the representation. In a second case, Breshears did not timely
respond to notice of a complaint from a State Bar grievance committee. In
a third case, Breshears was retained in a personal injury matter. He failed
to withdraw as counsel after termination of the representation. The complainant
hired other counsel, who found that the matter had been dismissed for want
of prosecution. In a fourth case, Breshears was hired to handle a possible
deceptive trade practices matter. He determined that filing a lawsuit in
the matter would not be practicable, but did not communicate this to his
client. He failed to send the client a letter terminating the employment
and failed to keep his client reasonably informed of the status of the matter.
Breshears violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a) and (b), 1.15(a)(3) and (d),
and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $1,000 in attorney's fees and $480
in restitution.
On April 5, Patrick E. Clarke [#04317000], 58, of
San Antonio agreed to a seven-year, partially-probated suspension effective
April 15, with the first three years actively served and the remainder probated.
An evidentiary panel of the District 10-B Grievance Committee found that
in one case, Clarke neglected a personal injury matter by failing to file
a claim. He failed to keep his client informed of the status of the claim
or respond to notice of the complaint from the grievance committee. In a
second case, Clarke was hired to handle a delinquent child support matter.
Clarke failed to respond to numerous phone calls from his client, failed
to pursue the matter, and failed to appear for court settings. Clarke informed
his client that the case was set for hearing, when in fact no pleadings
had been filed. Clarke did not timely respond to notice of the complaint
from the grievance committee. In a third case, Clarke was hired to handle
a divorce. Clarke failed to appear for the final hearing. He also failed
to advise the client of her recourse after the final hearing. Clarke failed
to effectuate the qualified domestic relations order and failed to respond
to notice of the complaint from the grievance committee. In a fourth case,
Clarke was hired in a personal injury matter. He neglected the matter by
failing to pursue it, even after having the file for two years. Clarke failed
to communicate with his client or return her file upon request. Clarke did
not respond to notice of the complaint from the grievance committee. Clarke
violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(3) and (a)(8).
On May 7, Kyle B. Collins [#04613400], 47, of Austin
accepted a one-year, fully-probated suspension effective June 1. The District
8-C Grievance Committee found that Collins neglected a criminal matter by
failing to timely file a motion for new trial or notice of appeal, or otherwise
preserve his client's right to appeal, even though he represented in open
court that he would do so. As a result, his client's appeal was dismissed.
Collins violated Rule 1.01(b)(1). He was ordered to pay $250 in attorney's
fees and $294.55 in court costs, and to attend a law office management course.
On April 8, Seguin attorney Betty Barret Homminga
[#00785394], 49, of Seguin agreed to a two-year, fully-probated suspension
effective April 15. The 25th District Court of Guadalupe County found that
Homminga agreed to represent a client in a child custody and visitation
proceeding. Homminga failed to keep her client informed regarding court
hearings and other matters in the case. She neglected the case by failing
to appear for scheduled hearings and failed to return the client's file
upon termination of representation. Homminga violated Rules 1.01(b)(1) and
(b)(2), 1.03(a), and 1.15(d). She was ordered to pay $750 in attorney's
fees.
On March 6, Doren Maner [#12894750], 46, of Lubbock
accepted a 12-month, partially-probated suspension effective June 1, with
the first month actively served and the remainder probated. The District
16-A Grievance Committee found Maner was hired in a personal injury case.
She failed to take any significant action in the case and failed to respond
to requests for information from her client. Maner closed her office without
any notification to the client and did not return the client's file. Maner
failed to respond to notice of the complaint from the grievance committee.
She violated Rules 1.01(a) and (b), 1.03(a) and (b), 1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(8).
On May 9, Michael D. Peay [#00795582], 32, of Dallas
accepted a 10-year, fully-probated suspension effective June 1. The District
6-A Grievance Committee found Peay violated Rules 8.04(a)(2) and (a)(3).
He was ordered to pay $500 in attorney's fees.
On May 9, Roy W. Richard [#16842900], 50, Steven
J. Zauft [#22251300], 53, and Peter S. Gross [#08537000], 71,
all of San Antonio, each agreed to three-year, fully-probated suspensions,
effective May 9. The 285th District Court of Bexar County found that from
1992 through 1994, Richard, Zauft, and Gross were involved in a partnership
for the practice of law with a fourth attorney. During that time, the fourth
attorney engaged in fee-splitting arrangements with nonlawyers, made other
improper payments to certain nonlawyers, and committed other violated of
the Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. The court found Richard, Zauft,
and Gross knew of the misconduct, which would raise substantial questions
regarding the fourth attorney's honest and trustworthiness or fitness as
a lawyer in other respects, and did not report it to the State Bar. Richard,
Zauft, and Gross violated Rule 8.03(a). They were ordered to pay $1,500
in attorney's fees.
On April 16, John Raymond Salazar [#17527150], 43,
of Dallas accepted a 25-month, partially-probated suspension effective May
15, with the first month actively served and the remainder probated. The
District 6-A Grievance Committee found that on Nov. 20, 1997, Salazar was
arrested for DWI and upon a plea of guilty received a 10-year sentence,
probated for five years, plus 20 days in the Dallas County jail. Salazar
was again arrested for DWI on May 18, 2000, and a motion to revoke probation
was filed. Salazar pleaded guilty on July 27, 2000, and was sentenced to
10 years, fined $1,000, and placed on probation after completing a 180-day
shock probation. He violated Rule 8.04(a)(2).
PUBLIC REPRIMANDS
On Feb. 5, Natalie A. Bills Reed [#00794514], 34,
of Dallas accepted a public reprimand. The District 6-A Grievance Committee
found the complainant retained Reed for representation in a child visitation
matter. Reed failed to perform any meaningful legal services on the complainantÕs
behalf or respond to the complainant's requests for information. Reed failed
to timely respond to notice of the complaint from the grievance committee.
She violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), and 8.04(a)(8). She was ordered
to pay $250 in attorney's fees and was referred to the Professionalism Enhancement
Program.
On April 10, Wilson B. Swan, Jr. [#19550500], 53,
of Houston received a public reprimand. The District 4-H Grievance Committee
found Swan failed to respond to notice of a complaint from the grievance
committee. He violated Rule 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $400 in attorney's
fees.
On April 6, R. Allen Jones [#10937300], 47, of Garland
received a public reprimand. The 101st District Court of Dallas County found
Jones neglected a legal matter and failed to keep his clients reasonably
informed of the status of a case. He violated Rules 1.01(b) and 1.03(a).
He was referred to the Professionalism Enhancement Program.
On Feb. 22, James H. Stokes, Jr. [#19270800], 44,
of SugarLand accepted a public reprimand. The District 10-B Grievance Committee
found that during 1994 and 1995, Stokes issued letters of protection to
various medical providers for clients involved in personal injury cases.
Stokes failed to promptly notify the complainants, representing a medical
provider, of the receipt of settlement funds in which the complainants had
an interest. He violated Rule 1.14(b).
table
of contents
|